In history of philosophy and thought, alternated philosophies that have led to a visione profetica della history and dell 'evolution Human, philosophies that try to seize the specificity and particularity of all existence and of any event.
Ogni epoca storica è un world a sé o la history è un susseguirsi di eventi razionali collegati da una trama, che ne determina lo svolgimento nello scorrere del time?
Ogni sguardo sul world ha un carattere di finitezza, as it is itself a historical point of view among the many points of view historical, or exists Hegel's absolute eye that is able to grasp rationally plot ontological reality?
we recall that, in each case, Hegel has done nothing to rationalize (attraverso la dialectic) una visione religiosa della history, Christian. Anche se quello di Hegel è un Christianity zoppo, purged of all irrational components, that are, actually, l’soul del messaggio di Christ. there is not love, There is no mercy, there is not faith, there is no redemption of the poor, righteous; in world of Hegel it's all right, perché tutto segue una strada razionale che non può be compresa (if not by the same Hegel), but not even discussed.
Once out of the cages of a totalizing reason, as Hegel, he saw in different historical development of the different degree of reason, è la fattività irrazionale e la consapevolezza della soggettività di tutti i securities storici che supportano la comprensione del world.
The history si trasforma dallo spirit storico ideale, in a set of portraits, biographies and events, that are necessary or incidental. The great and bloody leaders, incarnazione dello spirit universal, lasciano spazio al singolo uomo e alla singola donna, che ricominciano ad avere il proprio value, individuality as unique and unrepeatable.

The systems of thought that seek to grasp reality as a whole, to understand Every detail, to prophesy and predict individual behavior rest on bases metaphysical (as the thought of Hegel). Le filosofie che potremmo definire più “umili” e scettiche, are those who try to understand the uniqueness of each and every problem experienced; usually rest on logical or scientific, is, in each case, sono frutto di un job metodologico più rigoroso e concreto che non rigetta il “dato sperimentale”. Generally these philosophies like reductionism and analyticity, assumptions that are inherently opposed to a metaphysical view of reality and global (come la philosophy di Hegel). The philosophy analytics It goes into detail, it is almost obsessed, enters tunnels that are increasingly close, tight.
Prendiamo in considerazione il case Socrates.
Socrates non propone delle truth, but seeks to stimulate stakeholders to refine their survey, about search. His speeches have no fixed points, but they adapt to the situation, interlocutor; the validity of the propositions depends on the context and, from this, non può mai be svincolata.
Il suo messaggio si riferisce al singolo uomo, non alle masse; to a precise geographic position, non al world whole; to a specific time interval, not eternity; but paradoxically, precisely this specificity makes it eternal and immortal.
A Socrates “torpedine marina” sempre pronto a spazzare via le ostinate illusions dei saccenti, with sua fatale irony.
He continually asked “What is it?” (You're?). He is restraining the other party on a concept, a thought. Do not let him escape. He demanded precise answers. And the vagueness, rispondeva ancora con la solita question: “What is it?”
Socrates ed Hegel sono agli antipodi. Ma's philosophy ha consegnato alla storia tutte le sfumature del case.

And at this point we think we could divide our players into teams.
We could put Socrates, Pascal, Russel, Side, Leibniz ,Epicurus, Montaigne, Bacon, the first Plato the side of the analytical.
Hegel, Nietzsche
(a fake anti-metaphysical?), Heidegger, Aristotle, Husserl, about philosophy medievale, il secondo Plato e gli idealisti, on the other side.

The main conflict is between those who try to give a global view of reality and those investigating the individual event, la singola experience. Tra chi forma un grande sistema metafisico e chi non ha una philosophy del tutto. Among those who use a way to express themselves clearly and simply, and those who express themselves in a complex way, dark,, in some cases, even nebulous.
Among writer, e si sente inconfutabile nel suo write, and those sketches, tries,He does not write at all or accept conclusions aporetic.
The boundaries are not so clear, certainly in thought converge both current. The case esemplare è Plato. And in extreme cases, the philosopher consegna sempre una visione del world, that as elusive, It has its determination.

Universal theory or analysis of particular? last edit: Thursday,26 June 23:26, 2008 the nabladue
Share!










Submit
More share buttons
Share on Pinterest
There are no images.